(Affilated to National Federation of Postal Employees) Be Proud to be a Member Of AIPE Union
Saturday, December 31, 2011
Thursday, December 29, 2011
Promotion of the following officials who have been declared selected in the Postmaster Grade-I examination held on 12/6/2011 from the cadre of Postal Assistant to the cadre of Postmaster Grade –I
DEPARTMENT OF POSTS, INDIA
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL, KARNATAKA CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560216.
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL, KARNATAKA CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560216.
Memo No.STA/4-4/Postmasters/Appt/ PMGrade-I/II Bangalore 560216 28 /12/2011
In accordance with the instructions contained in Directorate letter No.4-17/2008-SPB-II dated 22/11/2010, the competent authority is pleased to order the promotion of the following officials who have been declared selected in the Postmaster Grade-I examination held on 12/6/2011 from the cadre of Postal Assistant to the cadre of Postmaster Grade –I in the scale of pay of Rs. 5200-20200 + Grade pay of Rs.2800/- ( pre revised scale of Rs 4500-125-7000) and allot them to the Region/division noted against their names.
The names are arranged as per merit. The seniority of officials who have scored equal marks have been arranged according to seniority in feeder cadre and also merit scored at the time of their initial selection as PAs.
Sl. No | Name of the Candidate | SC/ ST | Dn to which belong | Allotted to Region/Division |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1 | Ranganath S.M | Bg South | BB South Dn | |
2 | Shivanand B Rabakavi | Chikodi | NK Region ( Bagalkot Dn) | |
3 | Guruprasad | Udupi | SK Region | |
4 | R. Manjunath | Kolar | BG East Dn | |
5 | Smt Leela Vishwanatha | Tumkur | BG South Dn | |
6 | Satish P.N | Shimoga | SK Region | |
7 | Onkaramurthy M | Chitradurga | SK Region | |
8 | S.A Veeranna | Bellary | NK Region | |
9 | Nagaraja Buddenahalli | Bellary | NK Region | |
10 | Bheemasena A.J | Bellary | NK Region | |
11 | Sathishkumar S.T | Chikmagalur | SK Region | |
12 | K.L Krishnamurthy | Chikmagalur | SK Region- | |
13 | Elangovan.B | SC | Bg East | BG East Dn |
14 | Sanjay Ladda | Bidar | NK Region | |
15 | Manjunath.K | Bellary | NK Region | |
16 | Mohan A.Hosur | Gadag | NK Region( Dharwad Dn) | |
17 | Suresh Sanjeev Bhat | Sirsi | NK Region | |
18 | Naveen Kumar P.M | Mandya | SK Region | |
19 | Manjunath.H | SC | Chikmagalur | SK Region |
20 | Basawaraju Meda | ST | Gulbarga | NK Region |
21 | Kogali Sadyojathappa | Bellary | NK Region | |
22 | Nitin Mukundrao Kaulgud | Belgaum | NK Region | |
23 | Ramesh.N | Mandya | SK Region | |
24 | Pradeep Kumar.S | Mangalore | SK Region | |
25 | H.R Chandrashekar | Chikmagalur | SK Region | |
26 | Raghunatha Shetty.K | Mangalore | SK Region | |
27 | N. Ravindranath Reddy | Bellary | NK Region | |
28 | Gopal Rekheppa Lamani | SC | Haveri | NK Region |
29 | Channabasayya.M Kerimath | Belgaum | NK Region | |
30 | M.F Tumminakatti | Haveri | NK Region | |
31 | C.V Shivarama Sharma | Chitradurga | NK Region(Bellary) | |
32 | Sunil Kumar V | ST | Shimoga | Channapatna |
33 | Bhovi Y.P | SC | Mandya | SK Region |
34 | Tulajappa KhubappaLamani | SC | Bijapur | NK Region |
35 | Bhavanishankar.M | Puttur | SK Region | |
36 | Vijayakumar N Kuntoji | PH | Gulbarga | NK Region ( Dharwad Dn) |
37 | Shukamuni Aradhya.T | Chitrdurga | NK Region(Bellary Dn) | |
38 | Shrinivas T.P | SC | Kodagu | SK Region |
39 | Gurumurthy | Bg East | BG West Dn | |
40 | H.P Chandrashekhara | Chikmagalur | Channapatna Dn | |
41 | Manjunath H Kalasur | ST | Haveri | NK Region |
42 | S. Thirthaprasad | Puttur | SK Region | |
43 | Mallikarjuna | ST | Mandya | Channapatna Dn |
44 | Mohana M.K | ST | Kodagu | NK Region |
45 | Thippeswamy K.B | ST | Chitradurga | NK Region |
46 | R.Onkarappa | ST | Shimoga | Channapatna Dn |
The allotments have been made keeping in view the vacancy position/ merit in the selected list/ requests received/administrative requirement etc.
The concerned Regional Heads will allot officials promoted to the cadre of Postmaster Grade-I to divisions as per availability of vacancies in each division, the requests pending, if any at RO, before 03/01/2012 and endorse copies to this office by fax.
The concerned divisional heads will issue posting orders in respect of the officials allotted to their divisions before 06/01/2012 with copies to this office. The officials will join the new posts only on satisfactory completion of induction training.
-2-
The promotion is governed by the following conditions:
1. The officials selected cannot withdraw the option given for Postmaster cadre.
2. Their further career progression will be in the hierarchy in the Postmaster cadre only as per the provisions in the Recruitment Rules and not in the General Line.
3. In case of any vigilance/disciplinary case is pending against the official at the time of appointment, he should not be appointed as Postmaster Grade-I and the fact should be reported to this office at once.
4. The officials appointed will be on probation for a period of two years.
5. The officials on promotion may exercise option within one month of the date of promotion for fixation of pay under relevant provision of FR – 22.
There shall however be no further fixation of pay at the time of regular promotion if it is in the same grade pay as granted under MACPS.
Charge reports may be sent to all concerned and to this office.
( N.T. GANGE)
Assistant Postmaster General(Staff)
A copy of this memo is issued for information and necessary action to:
1. PMG SK Region, Bangalore 560001/NK Region, Dharwad- 580001
2. All SSPOs/SPOs in Karnataka Circle.
3. All Circle Secretaries, Class III Unions
4. Guard File
5. Office Copy
( N.T. GANGE)
Assistant Postmaster General(Staff)
for Chief Postmaster General,
Karnataka Circle, Bangalore 560216
DEPARTMENT OF POSTS, INDIA
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL, KARNATAKA CIRCLEBANGALORE-560216.
No. STA/4-4/Postmasters/Appt/PM Grade-I/II Bangalore 560216 28 /12/2011
Approval of the competent authority is also hereby conveyed for allotment of the following 2 officials who have been declared selected in the Postmaster Grade-I examination held on 12/6/2011 (but who are yet to under go induction training) to the Region/divisions mentioned against their names.
The officials will however be promoted /appointed to the cadre of Postmaster Grade-I in the allotted divisions on regular basis, only on successful completion of induction training.
Sl. No | Name of the Candidate Sri | SC/ ST | Dn to which belong | Allotted to |
1 | Laxman Chavdimani 8375655-K WO | - | Gadag, on deputation at APS | NK Region Belgaum Dn |
2 | Sri R.Srinivasa Rao | - | Shimoga | NK region Karwar |
This is in continuation of this office memo of even no. dated 28 /12/2011 ordering promotion/allotment of selected officials to the regions/divisions.
A copy of this memo is issued for information and necessary action to :-
1. Postmaster General,SK/NK Regions, Bangalore 560001/Dharwad 580001
2. SPOs Gadag/Shimoga/Belgaum/Karwar
3. All Circle Secretaries, Class III Unions
4. Guard File
5. Office Copy
(N.T.GANGE)
Assistant Postmaster General(Staff)
for Chief Postmaster General,
Karnataka Circle, Bangalore 560001
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
Monday, December 26, 2011
Perils of the new Postal Bill----- ARPITA MUKHERJEE
December 25, 2011:
The government is in the process of revamping an archaic postal act that needs to be realigned with the changing realities. In this regard, the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology is contemplating to replace the existing Post Office Act that dates back to 1898, with a new Bill.
A draft Post Office Bill is under consideration of the government. The Department of Posts (DOP) has already put the highlights of the proposed India Post Office Act 2011 on its Web site.
NEED FOR REFORM
There is no doubt that there is a need to reform and modernise the postal sector in India, and the new Postal Bill is an important step in that direction. The government needs to learn some critical lessons from the retail FDI stalemate while implementing changes in the Draft Postal Bill.
At a time when the Prime Minister, himself, is talking about building consensus with all the stakeholders to resolve the vexed issue of FDI in retail, the government should adopt a similar approach in finalising the provisions of the new Postal Bill.
A series of discussion should take place with all the stakeholders in a transparent manner so that a robust legislation can replace the existing act. The government has, so far, only given out the highlights of the provisions of the new Act.
In the interest of the public, it is important that the entire draft of the proposed Bill is put on the Web site for public comments.
EXCLUSIVE PRIVILEGE
From what could be gathered from the DoP Web site, the new Bill proposes to give exclusive privilege to India Post to convey express segment of all articles weighing up to 50gm.
In fact, EMS is not a basic postal service but a premium product. Hence, reservation for EMS is not justified.
Thus, such a restrictive practice is against the requirements of modern trade in an economy which, despite witnessing some slowdown, may still achieve a growth rate of 7 per cent. Thus, implementation of such a clause will inhibit growth.
A recent survey-based study by ICRIER and IIM (Calcutta) on “Facilitating trade and Global Competitiveness: Express Delivery Services in India”, which will be published by OUP in a book format in January 2012, found that the decision of the government to open the ‘reserved area' of 50 gm at a price multiple of twice the India Post EMS will adversely affect all segments of the EDS/courier industry, with the smaller players being affected more.
If the Bill is implemented with the minimum price multiple of twice the government EMS, then small courier companies may have to resort to cost-cutting methods to remain competitive in the domestic market.
To ask private operators to charge twice the Speed Post tariff, to say the least, is totally anti-consumer and a move to institute a government monopoly in the express segment which was hitherto non-existent. There is an apprehension that this will lead to significant job losses in the lower end of the EDS/courier business.
INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE
Also, according to the international practice, the reserved area is only for basic letters and not for express documents and parcels.
Moreover, it is difficult to monitor a reserved area because the courier industry is fragmented and largely unorganised and localised. Hence, this is nothing but an attempt to increase the sphere of the reserved area of the Department of Post. On the contrary, if private couriers are required to charge more than Speed Post, it would only burden the Indian consumer.
The new postal act should be fair and transparent. It should clearly define and distinguish between services, which are treated as USO/reserved and those that can be offered on a competitive basis. The ICRIER-IIMC survey found that currently there is no clear definition of postal and express delivery services in India. As the new Postal Bill proposes to cover all these services, it might lead to some complexity because globally there is a debate whether postal and EDS should be treated within a common framework.
The highlights of the Draft Postal Bill propose a registering authority to license companies in the reserved area.
This is nothing but licensing through the back door.
If that happens, then India Post, which is also providing express services will effectively become the regulator. Moreover, most of the mature markets have moved towards market access regime rather than the regulatory regime.
Intensive discussions with other government departments will definitely help formulate better law. The new regulation has to be futuristic and it should focus on postal reforms rather than monitoring the competitive, high-growth express industry.
To keep pace with the rapid growth, it is imperative that legislations are formed keeping in view the evolving market dynamics.
One of the banes of the Indian economy is that the regulations are often not supportive of market economy principles and hinder future growth prospects. The government should keep this in mind while finalising the Postal Bill 2011.
(The author is a professor at the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.)
Article published in
Friday, December 23, 2011
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
SB ORDER NO. 33/2011 : Issue of clarifications regarding premature closure of TD accounts
.
SB ORDER NO. 33/2011
F.No.113-01/2011-SB
Government of India
Ministry of Communications & IT
Department of Posts
Dak Bhawan, Sansad Marg,
New Delhi-110001, Dated: 13.12.2011
To
All Heads of Circles/Regions
Addl. Director General, APS, New Delhi.
Subject:- Issue of clarifications regarding premature closure of TD accounts.
Sir / Madam,
The undersigned is directed to refer to this office SB Order No. 27/2011 dated 24.11.2011 vide which decisions taken by Min. of Finance regarding changes in POTD scheme effective from 1.12.2011 were circulated.
2. Some circles have asked for clarifications regarding applicability of reduction in interest rate to be charged on premature closure of TD accounts to the old accounts. It is clarified that:-
(i) In case of premature closure of 1 Year, 2 Year, 3 Year or 5 Year account which were opened even before 1.12.2011, if the deposit is withdrawan after 6 months but before the expiry of one year from the date of deposit, simple interest at the rate applicable to from time to time to post office savings account shall be payable. The rate of interest shall be 3.5% up to the period 30.11.2011 and 4% thereafter.
(ii) In case of premature closure of 2 Year, 3 Year or 5 Year account which were opened even before 1.12.2011, if the deposit is withdrawan after the expiry of one year from the date of deposit, interest on such deposits shall be calculated at the rate, which shall be one per cent less than the rate which was applicable at the time of opening of TD account. Interest calculation tables for the TD accounts opened before 1.12.2011 and opened on or after 1.12.2011 and applied for premature closure on or after 1.12.2011 are enclosed.
3. It is requested that this clarification and interest calculation table may be circulated to all post offices immediately for information and necessary guidance please.
4. This issues with the approval of DDG(FS)
Yours faithfully,
(Kawal Jit Singh)
Assistant Director (SB)
Encl:- as above
Monday, December 12, 2011
Leave Rules and Procedure for Central Govt. Employees
Some important questions are arising among the serving employees of Central Government regarding their leave, the nodal Department of Central Government has now clarified as a method of Question and Answer, Frequently Asked Questions. We have reproduced and given below for your easy convenience to read the clarifications about Leave Entitlement, Earned Leave, Child Care Leave, Leave Encashment, EL Encashment, Encashment on LTC, Calculation of Encashment, CCL for Public Sector Employees…
Frequently asked Question by Departmental of Personnel and Training…
1. What are the leave entitlement of Govt. servants serving in a vacation Department w.e.f. 1.9.2008?
Earned leave for persons serving in Vacation Departments:-
Earned leave for persons serving in Vacation Departments:-
(1) (a) A Government servant(other than a military officer) serving in a Vacation Department shall not be entitled to any earned leave in respect of duty performed in any year in which he avails himself of the full vacation.
(b) In respect of any year in which a Government servant avails himself of a portion of the vacation, he shall be entitled to earned leave in such proportion of 30 days, as the number of days of vacation not taken bears to the full vacation:
Provided that no such leave shall be admissible to a Government servant not in permanent employ or quasi-permanent employ in respect of the first year of his service. (c) If, in any year, the Government servant does not avail himself of any vacation, earned leave shall be admissible to him in respect of that year under rule 26.
For the purpose of this rule, the term ‘year’ shall be construed not as meaning a calendar year in which duty is performed but as meaning twelve months of actual duty in a Vacation Department.
A Government servant entitled to vacation shall be considered to have availed himself of a vacation or a portion of a vacation unless he has been required by general or special order of a higher authority to forgo such vacation or portion of a vacation: Provided that if he has been prevented by such order from enjoying more than fifteen days of the vacation, he shall be considered to have availed himself of no portion of the vacation.
When a Government servant serving in a Vacation Department proceeds on leave before completing a full year of duty, the earned leave admissible to him shall be calculated not with reference to the vacations which fall during the period of actual duty rendered before proceeding on leave but with reference to the vacation that falls during the year commencing from the date on which he completed the previous year of duty.
As per Rule 29(1) the half pay leave account of every Government servant (other than a military officer shall be credited with half pay leave in advance, in two installments of ten days each on the first day of January and July of every calendar year.
2. Whether encashment of leave is allowed after LTC is availed.
Sanction of leave encashment should, as a rule, be lone in advance, at the time of sanctioning the LTC. However, ex-post facto sanction of leave encashment on LTC may be considered by the sanctioning authority as an exception in deserving cases within the time limit prescribed for submission of claims for LTC.
3. Whether encashment of Leave with LTC can be availed at the time when the LTC is availed by the Government servant only or can leave be encashed at the time when LTC is availed by family members?
A Govt. servant can be permitted to encash earned leave upto 10 days either at the time of availing LTC himself or when his family avails it, provided other conditions are satisfied.
4. Whether leave encashment should be revised on retrospective revision of pay/D.A?
In terms of 38-A of CCS(Leave) Rules, encashment of EL alongwith LTC is to be calculated on pay admissible on the date of availing LTC+DA admissible on that date. If pay or DA admissible has been revised with retrospective effect, the Govt. servant would be entitled to encashment of Leave on the revised rates.
5. Whether encashment of Earned Leave allowed to a Govt. servant prior to his joining the Central Govt. is to be taken into account while retiring ceiling of leave encashment on his superannuation and retirement from Central Govt.?
Encashment of EL allowed by the State Governments, Public Sector Undertakings, Autonomous Bodies for services rendered in the concerned Govt. etc. need not be taken into accounl for calculating the ceiling of 300 days of Earned leave to be encashed as per CCS(Leave) Rule.
6. Whether leave encashment can be sanctioned to a Govt. servant on his superannuation while under suspension?
Leave encashment can be sanctioned, however Rule 39(3) of CCS (Leave) Rules, 1972 allows with holding of leave encashment in the case of a Govt. servant who retires from service on attaining the age of superannuation while under suspension or while disciplinary or criminal proceedings are pending against him, if in view of the authority there is a possibility of some money becoming recoverable from him on conclusion of the proceedings against him. On conclusion of the proceedings he/she will become eligible to the amount so withheld after adjustment of Government dues, if any.
7.Whether leave encashment can be sanctioned to a Govt. servant on his dismissal/removal, from service?
A govt. servant who is dismissed/removed from service or whose services are terminated ceases to have any claim to leave at his credit from the date of such dismissal, as per rule 9(1). Hence he is not entitled to any leave encashment.
A govt. servant who is dismissed/removed from service or whose services are terminated ceases to have any claim to leave at his credit from the date of such dismissal, as per rule 9(1). Hence he is not entitled to any leave encashment.
8. Whether interest is payable on delayed payment of leave encashment dues?
No, there is no provision in the CCS (Leave) Rule 1972 for payment of interest on leave encashment.
No, there is no provision in the CCS (Leave) Rule 1972 for payment of interest on leave encashment.
9. Whether a Govt. servant who has been granted study leave may be allowed to resign to take up a post in other Ministries/Department of the Central Govt. within the bond period?
Yes, As per rule 50(5)(iii) a Govt. servants has to submit a bond to serve the Govt. for a period of 3 years. As the Govt. servant would still be serving the Govt. / Department he may be allowed to submit his technical resignation to take up another post
within the Central Govt.
Yes, As per rule 50(5)(iii) a Govt. servants has to submit a bond to serve the Govt. for a period of 3 years. As the Govt. servant would still be serving the Govt. / Department he may be allowed to submit his technical resignation to take up another post
within the Central Govt.
10. Whether women employees of Public sector undertakings/Bodies etc. Are entitled to CCL?
Orders issued by DOPT are not automatically applicable to the employees of Central Public Sector Undertakings/Autonomous Bodies, Ranking industry etc. It is for the PSUs/ Autonomous Bodies to decide the applicability of the rules/instructions issued for the central Government employees to their employees in consultation with their Administrative Ministries.
11. Whether Govt. servant can be permitted to leave station/go abroad while on CCL?
Child care leave is granted to a woman employee to take care of the needs of the minor children. If the child is studying abroad or the Govt. servant has to go abroad for taking care of the child, she may do so subject to other conditions laid down for this purpose.
12. What is the intention behind the instruction that CCL is to be treated like EL and sanctioned as such?
The intention is that CCL should be availed with prior approval of leave sanctioning authority and that the combination of CCL with other leave, if any, should be as per the restriction of combination with EL. The restriction of the limit of 180 days at a stretch as applicable in the case of EL will not apply in case of CCL. The other conditions like CCL may not be granted for less than 15 days or in more than 3 spells, etc., in a year, will apply.
Courtesy : http://cgstaffnews.comThursday, December 1, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)