Friday, April 13, 2012

Minutes of the Meeting of the Committee constituted under the Chairmanship of CGM, PLI to consider the issues related to Postmen

Sub: Minutes of the Meeting of the Committee constituted under the
Chairmanship
of CGM, PLI to consider the issues related to Postmen
D.G. Posts No. No:09-01/2005-WS-I/PE.I Dated: 9th April , 2012
The meeting of the Committee was held on 5th March, 2012 at 1100 hrs. in PLI
Directorate. The meeting was attended by the following:
i) Shri S.K. Sinha, CGM, PLI …. Chairperson
ii) Shri V.P. Singh, DDG (Establishment)
iii) Shri Satish Kumar, Director (FA)
iv) Mr. M. Krishnan, Secretary General, NFPE
v) Mr. D. Theagarajan, Secretary General, FNPO
vi) Mr. I.S. Dabas, General Secretary, AIPEU Postmen
& Group `D’/ MTS
vii) Mr. T.N. Rahate, General Secretary, NUPE Postmen
& Group `D’/MTS
2. The items assigned to the Committee as per the Terms of Reference were discussed
at length in the meeting. The gist of discussions and the decisions taken are as follows:
(I) Extraction of data entry work from Postmen: There was in principle agreement
of the staff side that the Postmen had no objection in performing the data entry work
provided suitable time factor for this element of work was allowed in their overall work
 load. The Committee noted that Meghdoot LAN norms for Postmen Module have
already been circulated by the Department on 28.7.2008 for implementation in all
computerized HPOs. It was, accordingly, decided that the time factor given for various
activities in the Postmen Module of MD – LAN may also be provided to Postmen, if they
undertake these activities. It was further decided that Directorate will consider to issue
suitable instructions to all the Circles in this regard by 30th April, 2012 as some Post
men find it difficult to make computer data entry , it was also agreed to impart necessary
computer training to Postmen.
(II) Irregular computation of working hours for Postmen working in field units:
Certain items in the revised norms for Postmen as issued by the Postal Directorate
vide F.No.9-1/2005-WS-I/PE.I dated 5.2.2010 were agitated by the staff side. After
discussion, the following decisions were taken:
a) The staff side mentioned that the time factor of 0.42 minutes provided for
`delivery of unregistered mail in multi-storied buildings’ (Sl.No.2) is grossly i
nadequate and needs to be relaxed. It was decided that while carrying out the review
of Postmen establishment, the time factor for delivery of unregistered mail (other
than in multi-storied buildings as given at Sl.No.1) in the revised norms will also
 be provided in cases of delivery of unregistered mail in multi-storied building
 in which mail boxes have not been provided at the ground floor;
b) On the demand of providing the same time factor for delivery of Speed Post

 articles as provided for Registered Mail, it was decided that `while carrying out
the review of postmen establishment, the person-specific speed post articles
 (Passports, Aadhaar Cards, Driving Licenses) will be provided the time factor of
2.5 minutes as provided for registered mail’.
c) The staff side vehemently demanded to work out suitable time factor for door-to-door
 distance travelled by foot by the Postmen. In the course of discussion, the Committee
noted that this demand of the staff side is being met by providing time factor for
delivery of unregistered mail (other than in multi-storied buildings) to unregistered
mail delivery in such multi-storied buildings which do not have mail boxes on the
ground floor. Moreover, the Committee also noted that no further action on this
 demand is perhaps called for in view of Note No.11 provided in the Directorate
 letter dated 5.2.2010 which is reproduced below:
d) Distance travelled means distance covered on the main roads, lanes and
bye lanes. Distance travelled covered for entering various houses is included
 in time factor for delivery of articles.”
The Staff Side was of the view that since Note No. 11 was prepared many years back
in 1975 -79, it does not reflect the present ground reality. This aspect may be considered
by the department at the time of next review.
e) The time factor provided for travelling distance by foot and by bicycle in hilly and
mountainous terrains of less congested areas needs to be relaxed in view of the extra
physical efforts and timing involved in covering such areas. The staff side was informed
that this aspect is under consideration by the Directorate and comments of several Circles
have already been received in this regard.
(III) Removal of minimum cycleable distance for grant of Cycle Maintenance
 Allowance of Postmen: The staff side was informed that necessary orders for
grant of Cycle Maintenance Allowance irrespective of the distance covered by the
Postmen have been issued by the Directorate. In view of this, the staff side agreed
 to close this item.
(IV) Scheme of payment of incentive to Postmen for delivery of Speed Post
articles: The Committee was informed that the CGM, Business Development and
Marketing Directorate (BD & MD) has already been requested to issue suitable
instructions to all the Circles to the effect that all payments of speed post delivery
incentive bills pertaining to Postmen may be cleared by 31st March, 2012. It
was, therefore, decided to close this item.
(V) Minimum and maximum area of beat to be covered on foot/bicycle during
duty hours: The staff side demanded that the Department should prescribe the
maximum beat length which a Postman is supposed to travel by foot / bicycle as there
 are several cases in which the Postmen have to travel 30-40 kms. per day in
effecting their deliveries. After discussion, the Committee felt that the incidence of
abnormally long Postmen beats is primarily because of non-review of Postmen
establishment in a proper manner in several Divisions. It was further decided that
a) The Directorate will consider to issue instructions to all the Circles to ensure
proper review of Postmen establishment, which should inter-alia include proper
 measurement of beat length, the rationalization of beats and demarcation of beats
in such a way that a Postmen is not required to travel unduly long distance in his duty
 hours;b) It was pointed out that the combination of beats being resorted to in the
Post Offices having 4+ strength of the Postmen should be removed. After detailed
 discussion it was decided that Directorate will consider issue of instructions to all the
Circles to the effect that combination of beats should be resorted to only by
exception as it adversely impacts the delivery efficiency;
c) It was pointed out by the staff side that Postmen face difficulty in delivery of
registered parcels weighing more than 5 kgms. each and EPP articles for which
the maximum weight of 35 kgms. per article has been fixed. It was highlighted that
 either some reasonable rate and mode of conveyance for delivering EPP articles
 should be fixed, or the rates of coolie charges fixed in the past should be revised
for efficient delivery of registered parcel. It was decided that the Directorate will
consider reiterating the instructions on coolie charges to all the Circles so that the
delivery of heavy parcels is not adversely affected.
                    Additional Points:
a) The staff side drew attention of the Committee to note at Sl.No.8 in the Directorate
 letter No.9-1/2005-W.S.I/PE.I dated 5.2.2010 which stipulates that “area having
a density of population of 2500 per Sq. KM may be taken as congested area”
and pointed out that the same has been incorrectly printed as it should refer to 2500 per
Sq. Mile instead of 2500 per Sq. KM. They quoted a clarification received from PTC,
Mysore which has cited Directorate letter dated 19.2.1975 indicating establishment
norms for Postmen and defining congested area as having a density of population of
2500 per Sq. Mile. After discussion it was agreed that Directorate would examine
and issue suitable amendment / corrigendum to the Note 8 of the revised norms of
 postmen establishment.
b) Creation of justified additional posts while implementing new system for
delivery work and allowing postmen to write correct remarks for non delivery:
The staff side drew attention to Item No.25 minutes of the last JCM meeting issued on
1.3.2012 wherein it is mentioned that the issue is under examination by the Postman
 Committee being Chaired by CGM (PLI). After discussion, the view emerged that this
 item is not part of Committee’s mandate as the issue pertains to creation / redeployment
 of post which is basically a policy issue. However, the staff side mentioned that the
 Postmen were not able to write correct remarks for non-delivery of articles due to
 heavy work in the Project Arrow Offices. It was, therefore, decided that the experience
gathered after implementation of Project Arrow in various Post Offices could be
examined and, if required, instructions with regard to delivery could be issued by the
 Directorate.
3. With the deliberations and decisions as noted above, the Committee concluded its
work with regard to the Terms of Reference assigned to it. The Committee, however,
felt that the Establishment Division of the Directorate may ensure follow-up action on
 the decisions of the Committee so that the issues are taken to their logical conclusion.
4. The final meeting of the Committee ended with Vote of Thanks to the Chair.
Sd/-
(V.P. Singh)
DDG (Estt.)
Copy to:
i) Shri S.K. Sinha, CGM, PLI
ii) Ms. Kalpana Rajsinghot, Director (Estt. & DE)
Shri Satish Kumar, Director (Finance)
iii) Shri Prabhu Das Xalxo, ADG (Estt.)
iv) Mr. M. Krishnan, Secretary General, NFPE
v) Mr. D. Theagarajan, Secretary General, FNPO
vi) Mr. I.S. Dabas, General Secretary, AIPEU Postmen
& Group `D’/ MTS
vii) Mr. T.N. Rahate, General Secretary, NUPE Postmen
& Group `D’/MTS
Copy for information to:
Director (SR) – with reference to SR & Legal Section’s letter
No.1/2/2010-SR dated 9.1.2012 on Formation of a
Committee to discuss issues relating to Postmen –
Change in its composition.

1 comment:

  1. sir i appointed as postman on 03-08-2005. and scale is fixed for Rs 3050 and after revised scale 8060-00 fixed and i passed pa lgo examination and joined as pa on 30-09-2009 my scale is fixed for Rs 9770-00 i refer my junior with divisional gradation list now ro is returned with remark compare with appointing unit. now ia have chance to compare my asp sub diviosonl seniority list my junior joined as on 1-02-2007 with basic 8460 what i do please guide me i asked shridharn he said that divisional gradation list is a document for stepping up thanking u sir i waited for favourable reply

    ReplyDelete